
SketchUp
By Tom Miller
The Test Drive
When high
performance cars are reviewed, trials take place on a test track, while
sedans and minivans are tested on conditions that reflect actual use.
I modeled a house by Frances D.K. Ching (figure 6), the first house
many architects learn to draw (this may show my age).
The house's
simple geometry demonstrates some of SketchUp's features, as well as
its ease of use. SketchUp encourages the user to model as simply as
possible, the carrot being quicker turnaround time, the stick being
the inadvertent collapsing or closure of the wrong solid.
Occasionally,
some of SketchUp's features become double edged, unexpectedly cutting
both ways. There are occasions when you do not intend to close a solid
or occasions that the wrong solid is closed, and it may
not become apparent until those layers are turned back on. These are
bothersome, but probably just part of the natural learning curve.
It is best to think
of modeling as only showing what is required to communicate intent.
A Hollywood set, from the camera's angle, is a city street, but behind
the scenes it's merely a prop façade. The building mass is modeled
first, a cube
essentially, then features are subtracted or added. Resist the urge
to model walls and
you'll be fine.
For the parapet,
I offset another form and pushed it down 2'-0". This is a good
example of adapting to a new paradigm: model what you see, not what
you know, or any actual built reality. Windows and furniture are best
assembled as a component (figure 7) with SketchUp's blocks or cells.
SketchUp
comes with about 150 preassembled components. These are building components,
and entourage items, very schematic in nature, as they should be.
Components are easily created and modified, updating the other instances
as well. SketchUp can specify the behavior of these elements so a
window sticks to a wall and openings are cut in the plane where the
object is inserted. The window will also move with the wall.
 |
|
Figure
7
|
What's Fun
About It?
The fun
really begins with SketchUp's immediate design gratification. Rotating
a model without a redraw is like holding
the model in your hand. You can see in figure 8 what the Ching house
would look like in brick (yuck!), or in figure 9even pink with Astroturf
flooring (worse!).
SketchUp enables
one to work in real-time rendered mode, with shade and shadow. This
is one of its strengths, and is accomplished by manipulating your
video card's acceleration features. The drawback is the model is not
a volume but composed entirely of surfaces.
There are
not any plans
on introducing
a solids modeling kernel, like Parasolidsor
Acis, due to the increased processing power required as well as the
Boolean tools that you would require to model these solids.
 |
|
Figure
8
|
These features
would bog down any hope of rotating the model with material definitions
without redrawing as well as complicate the sublime simplicity of
SketchUp. They would also act as a barrier and reduce the connection
the designer would have with the model, and be less like SketchUp
and more like one of the other CAD packages.
Different Yet
the Same
SketchUp
has many of the features you know and love like layers, ability to
apply colors and materials to models, a "jitter lines" feature,
ability to import and export DWG and DXF
files and a small file size. Pan and rotate are effortless as is zoom,
and all can be activated with a wheel mouse, reducing mouse clicks
again. What's missing is an expanded print and image export feature.
Printing
is pretty straightforward, but essentially limited to screen dumps.
The lack of any text features increases the need for post-processing.
The lack of any OLE integration makes your job harder.
 |
|
Figure
9
|
According to a
reliable source, @Last has OLE integration high on their list for
release 2. The need for a VRML export feature would aid distribution
to clients and consultants, which again my reliable source tells me
is also high on the list for release 2. Release 2 doesn't have a date
but is expected later this year.
Tech support is handled entirely via email with response time within
the hour, and I found it both thorough and impressive. Additionally,
I found the chap I dealt with interested in finding a solution to
my problem as well as explaining it in terms that increased my understanding
of the program.
Who Needs SketchUp?
Anyone who
needs to communicate 3D information would do well with SketchUp. Large
vertical organizations that intermediate the schematic design, design
development, and construction documents phases of a construction project
also could use SketchUp. The same for contractors, design build firms,
planners, urban designers and interior designers.
Small organizations that want to migrate to 3D without abandoning
their existing 2D CAD package as well as their legacy CAD library,
and need interoperability with DWG or DXF files could benefit from
SketchUp. Even with Corel Draw, Photoeditor and Photoshop I still
use Microsoft Paint to assemble an image on the quick and dirty. SketchUp
would fill the same role for me with 3D modeling.
So pretty much everyone who wants 3D quick and cheap could find a
place in his or her workflow. 